Mila Alemasov and Victor Popov - Page 19




                                       - 19 -                                         
          6651(a)(1); United States v. Boyle, 469 U.S. 241, 245 (1985).               
          “Reasonable cause” requires the taxpayer to demonstrate that he             
          exercised ordinary business care and prudence.  United States v.            
          Stanford, 979 F.2d 1511, 1514 (11th Cir. 1992).  “Willful                   
          neglect” is defined as a “conscious, intentional failure or                 
          reckless indifference.”  United States v. Boyle, supra at 245.              
               Petitioners concede that, although they were given an                  
          extension of time to file their 2002 return until August 15,                
          2003, the return was not filed until September 16, 2003.  Since             
          the return for the year at issue was filed late, the only issue             
          that remains is whether the late filing is excused by reasonable            
          cause.  Sec. 6651(a)(1); United States v. Boyle, supra at 245.              
          Petitioners’ explanation for failure to file their return timely            
          was that their return preparer filed a Form 2688 to request                 
          additional time to file their 2002 return.  Respondent has no               
          record that such a request was made.  Additionally, petitioners             
          contend that respondent’s Appeals Office conceded the section               
          6651(a)(1) addition to tax.  In support of this argument,                   
          petitioners point to the Certificate of Assessments, Payments,              
          and Other Specified Matters, which was offered into evidence by             
          respondent and shows that, for the year at issue, respondent                
          abated the addition to tax on October 20, 2003.  Respondent                 
          denies making such a concession and insists that imposition of              








Page:  Previous  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007