- 7 - At trial, petitioner did not offer any receipts or documents to substantiate his claimed employee business expenses. Instead, he testified as to his claimed business expenses. With respect to the uniforms and dry cleaning, equipment, and professional dues, the Court is satisfied that petitioner did incur deductible expenses for these items. Although petitioner admitted he did not have receipts to substantiate these expenses, he testified credibly with respect to these items and their business purpose. Petitioner did admit, however, that his return preparer “exceeded” what was actually spent on uniforms, dry cleaning, and equipment during the year at issue. Accordingly, petitioner conceded that he spent, at most, $4,000 on uniforms and dry cleaning and $1,200 to $1,500 on equipment in 2002. In the absence of adequate substantiation, the Court may, if convinced by the evidence, estimate the amount of deductible expenses incurred. Cohan v. Commissioner, supra at 543-544. Under the Court’s discretionary authority pursuant to Cohan, the following amounts are allowed as unreimbursed employee business expense deductions on Schedule A: Amount Uniforms and dry cleaning $ 500 Equipment 350 Professional dues 500 Total $1,350 With regard to the $2,960 in unreimbursed employee business expense for tuition, petitioner testified that his coursework atPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011