- 15 - delinquent periodic alimony stated in her petition to the Virginia Beach District court, subtract $71,843 as the amount of periodic alimony that Ms. Amarasinghe waived according to the Order, and add the result to the lump-sum spousal support of $24,043.80. Under this calculation, $61,400.80 of the distribution would be alimony. The Order provides that the distribution would first bring current Dr. Amarasinghe’s payments for child support, insurance premiums,5 and lump-sum alimony, and the remainder would bring current Dr. Amarasinghe’s periodic alimony payments. We find that Ms. Amarasinghe’s original calculation mirrors this intention because it first accounts for child support, insurance premiums, and lump-sum alimony, and allocates the remaining distribution to periodic alimony. By contrast, Ms. Amarasinghe’s alternative first accounts for the lump-sum alimony and alimony not waived; therefore more of the distribution is allocated to child support and insurance premiums than necessary to bring those obligations current, which would require Ms. Amarasinghe to waive more of her periodic alimony than is necessary. Because we find that Ms. Amarasinghe’s original calculation reflects the allocation made in the Order and makes no unnecessary allocations, we conclude that Dr. Amarasinghe may deduct $75,318 5 The parties agree that the insurance premiums constitute child support.Page: Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 NextLast modified: March 27, 2008