James E. Anderson and Cheryl J. Latos - Page 19




                                       - 19 -                                         
               dence] should be liquidated by either refinancing or                   
               selling the property.                                                  
                       Balancing Efficient Collection with the                        
                   Instructiveness of Proposed Collection Actions                     
               Although the tax liens are inherently intrusive, you                   
               have proposed no other method of securing the govern-                  
               ment’s interest.  Therefore, the liens should remain on                
               file until the balances due in question are fully paid.                
               [Reproduced literally.]                                                
                                       OPINION                                        
               A taxpayer may raise challenges to the existence or the                
          amount of the taxpayer’s underlying tax liability if the taxpayer           
          did not receive a notice of deficiency or did not otherwise have            
          an opportunity to dispute such liability, sec. 6330(c)(2)(B),               
          including the tax liability reported in the return that such                
          taxpayer filed, Montgomery v. Commissioner, 122 T.C. 1 (2004).              
          Where the validity of the underlying tax liability is properly at           
          issue, the Court will review the matter on a de novo basis.                 
          Where the validity of the underlying tax liability is not prop-             
          erly at issue, the Court will review the determinations of the              
          Commissioner of Internal Revenue for abuse of discretion. Sego v.           
          Commissioner, 114 T.C. 604, 610 (2000); Goza v. Commissioner, 114           
          T.C. 176, 181-182 (2000).                                                   
               Before turning to the position of Ms. Latos in these cases,            
          it is important to bear in mind that Ms. Latos and respondent               
          stipulated that (1) it is only the unpaid assessed self-employ-             
          ment tax determined in the 1995 notice of deficiency (as well as            







Page:  Previous  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007