- 2 - MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION WHERRY, Judge: This case is before the Court on a petition for judicial review of a Notice of Determination Concerning Collection Action(s) Under Section 6320 and/or 6330.1 The issue for decision is whether respondent abused his discretion in sustaining the proposed levy action for the Estate of Melvine B. Atkinson’s (the estate) Federal estate tax liabilities. FINDINGS OF FACT Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found.2 1Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code (Code) of 1986, as amended. 2In the stipulation of facts, the estate and respondent both reserved relevancy objections to attached exhibits. Fed. R. Evid. 402 provides the general rule that all relevant evidence is admissible, while evidence which is not relevant is not admissible. Fed. R. Evid. 401 defines the relevant evidence as “evidence having any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action more probable or less probable than it would be without the evidence.” While the relevancy of some exhibits is certainly limited, the Court finds that the exhibits meet the threshold definition of relevant evidence and are admissible. The Court will give the exhibits only such consideration as is warranted by their pertinence to the Court’s analysis of the case. The estate also reserved objections based on Fed. R. Evid. 106, alleging that exhibits “[failed] to include communications between the Respondent’s counsel and the Petitioner’s prior counsel, who represented the Petitioner in protracted Tax Court litigation (including two appeals thereof)”. The Court overrules the estate’s objection as the evidence the estate seeks admitted is not relevant to the instant case. The estate also reserved objections, based on Fed. R. Evid. 403, “to the introduction of the Petitioner’s personal affairs (continued...)Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 10, 2007