- 2 - other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case. Manuel Ayala, Jr., and Carol A. Ayala (collectively, petitioners) received a notice of deficiency in which respondent determined: (1) Deficiencies in income taxes for 2002, 2003, and 2004 of $2,295, $4,050, and $4,459, respectively, and (2) accuracy-related penalties under section 6662(a) for negligence or intentional disregard of rules or regulations of $459, $810, and $891.80, respectively. The basis for the deficiency determination was the denial of deductions claimed by petitioners for travel expenses under section 162(a)(2). We are asked to decide whether petitioners may deduct those expenses. This requires that we decide whether petitioners were “away from home” when they incurred the expenses. If we sustain respondent’s determination, we are also asked to decide whether petitioners are liable for the accuracy-related penalties. Background Some of the facts have been stipulated, and they are so found. We incorporate by reference the parties’ stipulation of facts and accompanying exhibits. Petitioners listed their mailing address on their petition as Las Vegas, Nevada. Mr. Ayala testified at trial that petitioners’ permanent mailing address is Rocklin, California.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 10, 2007