- 3 - On January 27, 2006, respondent issued petitioner a notice of deficiency for 2002. Respondent disallowed petitioner’s claimed itemized deductions for the charitable contributions and the unreimbursed employee expenses.2 On the basis of the disallowance, respondent determined a deficiency in petitioner’s 2002 Federal income tax of $1,953. In response to the notice of deficiency, petitioner filed a petition with this Court on May 1, 2006. Contrary to the requirements of Rule 34(b)(4), the petition did not contain clear and concise statements of each and every error which petitioner alleged to have been committed by respondent in the determination of the deficiency. On May 16, 2006, respondent filed a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. On May 19, 2006, the Court ordered petitioner to file an amended petition setting forth with specificity each error petitioner alleged respondent made in the determination of the deficiency. On July 10, 2006, petitioner filed a 132-page amended petition which consisted mainly of allegations of conspiracy by government agencies and third parties not related to this suit. On August 16, 2006, the Court heard arguments on respondent’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. 2 Respondent also increased petitioner’s child tax credit from $513 to $600 but reduced the additional child tax credit from $87 to zero. Petitioner has not disputed this change.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 10, 2007