Suzanne E. Barrera, a.k.a. Suzanne E. Battle - Page 8




                                        - 7 -                                         
          of $14,340,4 which amount was assessed by respondent on February            
          8, 1999.  At some point in 1998 or 1999, Mr. Barrera explained to           
          petitioner that the tax problems with the IRS stemmed from                  
          expenses of his mortgage brokerage business that the IRS                    
          reclassified as personal expenses and disallowed as business                
          expense deductions.                                                         
               By late 1999 and into 2000, petitioner saw that Mr. Barrera            
          was working “less and less” at his successor home improvement               
          loan business, that cash was not coming in from Mr. Barrera’s               
          business as it had been earlier in their marriage, and that Mr.             
          Barrera did not have the same type of income anymore.  Petitioner           
          felt that, although Mr. Barrera continued to act like “everything           
          was fine”, their financial situation was changing.                          
               In late 1999, petitioner and Mr. Barrera put their Pine Bay            
          Estates house on the market.  Petitioner did not want to sell the           
          Pine Bay Estates house and was not happy that it had to be sold.            
          When the Pine Bay Estates house had to be sold, petitioner knew             
          there were financial problems facing her family.                            
               Around this same time, Mr. Barrera approached petitioner               
          about withdrawing money from her IRA, and she initially refused             
          Mr. Barrera’s request.  By the time she and Mr. Barrera were                
          trying to sell their Pine Bay Estates house, however, petitioner            

               4   No deficiency was determined by respondent with respect            
          to petitioner and Mr. Barrera’s joint return for taxable year               
          1996.                                                                       






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007