- 5 - Section 152(e)(1)1 provides a general rule that limits the dependency exemption deduction as follows: If the child received over half of his support during the calendar year from his parents who lived apart at all times during the last 6 months of the calendar year and is in the custody of one or both parents for more than one-half of the calendar year, then the child is treated as receiving over half of his support during the calendar year from the parent having custody for a greater portion of the calendar year (the custodial parent).2 But section 152(e)(2) provides an exception to the general rule of section 152(e)(1): “If * * * the custodial parent signs a written declaration (in such manner and form as the Secretary may by regulations prescribe)” that he will not claim the child as a dependent and the noncustodial parent attaches the written declaration to his return for the taxable year, then the noncustodial parent is entitled to the dependency exemption 1Sec. 152(e)(1) applies to both married parents and parents who have never been married to each other. King v. Commissioner, 121 T.C. 245, 251 (2003). 2In the present case, the exceptions in sec. 152(e)(3) and (4) do not apply. There was no multiple support agreement as defined in sec. 152(c) and, since the Judgment of Support was entered in 2001, there is no pre-1985 instrument. Thus, petitioner is entitled to the dependency exemption only if the requirements of sec. 152(e)(2) are met.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 10, 2007