- 2 - that the assessment of penalties relating to partnership adjustments is not subject to deficiency procedures, and that the deficiencies in income tax were paid and assessed prior to the issuance of the notice of deficiency. See generally Kligfeld Holdings v. Commissioner, 128 T.C. 192 (2007), and Notice 2000- 44, 2000-2 C.B. 255, for a general description of the transaction in this case. Respondent determined in an affected items notice the following deficiencies in and penalties on petitioners’ Federal income tax: Penalty Year Deficiency Sec. 6662(a) 1999 [2]$3,460,695 $1,399,552.80 2000 12,137 4,854.80 2 The deficiency in docket No. 12341-05 is $38,187 greater than the deficiency listed above because the $38,187 was assessed as a computational adjustment. See infra pp. 4-5. The issues for decision are: (1) Whether petitioners have previously paid a portion of the amount stated in the affected items notice of deficiency, and (2) whether the Court lacks jurisdiction over the section 6662(a) penalties determined in the affected items notice. 1(...continued) on a statutory notice of deficiency sent to John and Judith Bedrosian. Docket No. 9664-07 is a partnership-level proceeding concerning the validity of a final partnership administrative adjustment notice.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: March 27, 2008