Wayne D. Blake - Page 5




                                        - 5 -                                         
          testimony, he arrived at the U.S. Post Office in Owings Mills,              
          Maryland (Owings Mills Post Office), around 5:30 p.m. on January            
          16, 2007, and found that that office was closed.  Mr. Dahne                 
          further testified that he purchased stamps in the foyer of the              
          Owings Mills Post Office and placed them on the envelope contain-           
          ing the petition.  According to Mr. Dahne, he then observed a               
          U.S. Postal Service truck near a mailbox located about 60 feet              
          from the Owings Mill Post Office.  Mr. Dahne testified that he              
          approached the driver of that truck, handed the driver the                  
          envelope containing the petition, and asked whether that envelope           
          would be postmarked on January 16, 2007, to which the driver                
          responded that it would.                                                    
               We found Mr. Dahne’s testimony to be credible.  Moreover,              
          Mr. Dahne’s testimony is consistent with the Court’s having                 
          received from him, along with the petition, a $60 check in                  
          payment of the Court’s filing fee that was dated January 16,                
          2007, the date on which he testified he handed the envelope                 
          containing the petition to a U.S. Postal Service employee.  Mr.             
          Dahne’s testimony is also consistent with the fact that the                 
          regular U.S. Postal Service mail sent to and received by the                
          Court is subject to irradiation treatment that has resulted in              
          brief delays in the receipt of such mail.5                                  

               5In respondent’s motion, respondent alleges:                           
                                                             (continued...)           






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007