McLu Buah and Peter Buah - Page 12




                                       - 11 -                                         
          addresses, Mrs. Buah had bank statements and other correspondence           
          sent to Mr. Buah’s Post Office box.                                         
               Petitioners also testified that, during the time they                  
          purportedly were living apart, Mrs. Buah lived with a friend and            
          Mr. Buah lived at another location.  Petitioners did not call               
          either person as a witness.  We infer that such testimony would             
          not have been favorable to petitioners.  See Wichita Terminal               
          Elevator Co. v. Commissioner, 6 T.C. 1158, 1165 (1946), affd. 162           
          F.2d 513 (10th Cir. 1947); Arnold v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo.               
          2007-168.                                                                   
               Petitioners have failed to prove that Mr. Buah was not a               
          member of Mrs. Buah’s household for the last 6 months of 2002 or            
          2003.  Accordingly, Mrs. Buah is not entitled to the earned                 
          income credit for the years in issue.  We need not address                  
          respondent’s alternative position that Mrs. Buah did not furnish            
          over one-half of the cost of maintaining the household.                     
               B.  Head of Household Filing Status                                    
               Section 1(b) imposes a special income tax rate on a taxpayer           
          filing as head of household.  To qualify as a head of a                     
          household, a taxpayer must be unmarried at the end of the taxable           
          year.  Sec. 2(b)(1).  As is relevant here, a taxpayer’s marital             
          status is determined under section 7703(b).  See sec. 2(c).  For            
          the reasons discussed above, we find that Mrs. Buah was married             
          at the end of the years in issue.  Therefore, she is not entitled           







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007