- 4 - again referenced petitioner’s failure to file his 2002 Federal income tax return. The third letter sent on March 5, 2005 by the Kansas City Service Center’s ACS to petitioner was mailed to “84 STERLING PIRCLE [sic] APT 303[,] WHEATON, IL”, an incorrectly typed version of the Wheaton address. This third letter was a Final Notice of Intent to Levy and Notice of Your Right to a Hearing (final notice) with respect to petitioner’s Federal income tax liabilities for the taxable years 2000 and 2001. These liabilities, determined on the basis of substitutes for return since petitioner did not file returns for those years, were assessed after petitioner failed to commence an action for redetermination pursuant to section 6213(a).2 The final notice listed outstanding liabilities in the aggregate amount of some $19,000 and notified petitioner of his right to an administrative hearing. Petitioner never received the final notice, and it was returned to respondent as undeliverable by the Postal Service on April 8, 2005. On June 30, 2005, respondent issued a notice of levy to petitioner’s employer, Napleton’s River Oaks Cadillac in Chicago, Illinois, where petitioner was employed as a commission-based 2 Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011