- 3 - 2003 lists the employee’s name as “Michael Byard” and the occupation in which the expenses were incurred as “Comp Progra”. The $24,000 expense deduction at issue was recorded on the 2003 Form 2106 on line 2 entitled “Parking fees, tolls, and transportation, including train, bus, etc., that did not involve overnight travel or commuting to and from work”. On Schedule C, Profit or Loss From Business, of their Form 1040, U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, petitioners listed both their names under business proprietor and stated their principal business as a “Janitorial Cleaning Service”. Petitioners reported $9,864 in gross receipts on their Schedule C and $20,344 in total expenses, resulting in a net loss of $10,480. Line 13, entitled “Depreciation and section 179 expense deduction”, of their Schedule C has no entry. On line 9, entitled “Car and truck expenses”, of that same form, petitioners claimed a deduction of $5,054. Discussion The issue in this case is whether petitioners made a valid section 179 election to deduct $24,000 of the cost of a sport- utility vehicle (SUV) purchased in 2003 and used in their part- time janitorial cleaning business. Petitioners argue that the $24,000 expense deduction claimed on Form 2106 was placed on the wrong form, was related to the purchase of the SUV allegedly used 100 percent in the cleaning business, and that their intent wasPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 10, 2007