Ronald E. Byers - Page 10




                                       - 10 -                                         
          less the truck lease payments), amounts far in excess of the                
          exemption amount.3                                                          
               Petitioner has not shown that the bank deposits charged to             
          petitioner by respondent as additional income for the years in              
          issue represented nontaxable income.  See Ellis v. Commissioner,            
          T.C. Memo. 2007-207.  We sustain respondent’s determination of              
          petitioner’s taxable income for 1999 through 2002, and we                   
          conclude that petitioner was required to file Federal income tax            
          returns for 1999 through 2002 and to pay Federal income taxes.              
               Petitioner argues that he was an employee of ECI, that under           
          section 3402(a)(1) employers are required to withhold Federal               
          income taxes from employee wages, and that ECI rather than he               
          should be held liable for payment to respondent of petitioner’s             
          unpaid Federal income and employment taxes.                                 
               However, an employer’s failure to withhold from employee               
          wages Federal income taxes does not extinguish an individual                
          taxpayer’s requirement to report income and to pay to respondent            
          Federal income taxes.  See Church v. Commissioner, 810 F.2d 19,             
          20 (2d Cir. 1987); Latos v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2007-265;              


               3 At a recent Minnesota Tax Court trial to determine                   
          petitioner’s liability to pay 2000 and 2001 Minnesota income                
          taxes, petitioner refused to testify under oath and argued that             
          he had not received from ECI any earnings in 2000 and 2001.  The            
          Minnesota Tax Court found petitioner liable for State income tax            
          for 2000 and 2001 based on income from petitioner’s truck driving           
          activity with ECI.  See generally Byers v. Commissioner, 2006               
          WL2380586 (Minn. Tax Reg. Div. Aug. 14, 2006), amended on rehg.             
          2006 WL3155401 (Minn. Tax Reg. Div. Nov. 2, 2006), and affd. 735            
          N.W.2d 671 (Minn. 2007).                                                    





Page:  Previous  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next 

Last modified: March 27, 2008