Steve A. and Donna Wood Chamberlain - Page 9




                                        - 9 -                                         
          the dependency exemption and child tax credit claimed by                    
          petitioners for the taxable year 2003.5                                     
          C.   Estoppel                                                               
               Petitioners further argue that respondent’s past acceptance            
          of Federal income tax returns that did not conform to the written           
          declaration requirement estops the disallowance of the dependency           
          exemption and child tax credit for the taxable year 2003.  To               
          raise estoppel as an affirmative defense a party must                       
          specifically assert it in his or her pleading.  Rule 39; Lodi               
          Iron Works, Inc. v. Commissioner, 29 T.C. 696, 701 (1958).                  
          Although no technical form is required to assert a matter in a              
          pleading, it must be simple, precise, and direct, so that it                
          gives the opposing party and the Court fair notice that the                 
          matter is in controversy.  Rule 31(a) and (b).  Petitioners’                
          amended petition adheres to these requirements.                             
               Petitioners claim that respondent’s failure to challenge the           
          dependency exemption on Mr. Chamberlain’s individual and joint              
          Federal income tax returns for the taxable years 1996 through               
          2002, despite Mr. Chamberlain’s failure to comply with the                  
          written declaration requirement, should prevent respondent from             
          now demanding that a Form 8332 accompany their 2003 joint return.           
          In the alternative, petitioners claim that respondent’s failure             

               5We do not address here the question of whether Mrs.                   
          Norris’s notarized letter would fulfill the requirements of Form            
          8332 if petitioners had had the opportunity to attach it to their           
          2003 joint return.                                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007