- 8 - any such allegations. Therefore, respondent has no burden of production under section 7491(c). Funk v. Commissioner, supra at 218; Swain v. Commissioner, 118 T.C. 358, 364-365 (2002); Carlo v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2005-165; Mitchell v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2005-85. Even if it were assumed that respondent bears the burden of production with respect to the additions to tax, respondent has proffered sufficient evidence to meet that burden. Respondent submitted, as exhibits to his motion to dismiss, petitioner's transcripts of account for 2001 and 2002. Petitioner's transcript of account for 2002 indicates that a return was due from petitioner on April 15, 2003, but no return was filed. This evidence is sufficient to satisfy respondent's burden of production under section 7491(c) with respect to the section 6651(a)(1) addition to tax determined in this case, see Wheeler v. Commissioner, 127 T.C. 200, 208 (2006), and petitioner has not presented any evidence indicating reasonable cause for her failure to file a return for 2002, see sec. 6651(a)(1); Rule 142(a)(1); Higbee v. Commissioner, supra at 446-447 (noting that the taxpayer has the burden of proof regarding reasonable cause).4 4 The sec. 6651(a)(1) addition at issue consists of an amount determined in the notice of deficiency ($6,208,944) and an additional amount asserted in the amended answer ($689,883). The latter results from the elimination of the sec. 6651(c)(1) (continued...)Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 10, 2007