Amy A. Christman - Page 12




                                       - 11 -                                         
          2004-212.  When she signed the 1998 and 1999 joint income tax               
          returns in July and October 2000, respectively, petitioner was              
          aware that she and her former spouse had failed to timely file              
          and timely pay income taxes for 1996 through 1999.  At no point             
          did she question Mr. Christman as to how and when the taxes and             
          any additions to tax would be paid.  For these reasons, the Court           
          concludes that petitioner has not shown that it was reasonable              
          for her to believe that any additions to tax for 1998 and 1999              
          would be paid at the time she signed the joint income tax returns           
          for the years at issue, particularly since she had no reason to             
          believe that the taxes for those years would be paid at the time            
          the returns were filed.                                                     
               Petitioner’s filing for divorce prior to requesting relief             
          under section 6015(f) favors granting her relief.  Rev. Proc.               
          2003-61, sec. 4.03(2)(a)(i).  Yet, in those cases where the                 
          requesting spouse’s marital status favors granting relief, Rev.             
          Proc. 2003-61, sec. 4.03(2)(a)(ii), conditions that relief on a             
          showing that the requesting spouse will suffer economic hardship            
          in the absence of relief.  Relief has been granted to taxpayers             
          who establish that they would suffer economic hardship by being             
          unable to afford basic living expenses in the absence of such               
          relief.  See, e.g., Knorr v. Commissioner, supra; Foor v.                   
          Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2004-54; Ferrarese v. Commissioner, T.C.           
          Memo. 2002-249; August v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2002-201; Rowe           
          v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2001-325.  Petitioner was gainfully             





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007