Cindee J. Conner - Page 13




                                       - 12 -                                         
          petitioner admitted that she had neither confirmed with her then            
          husband that a joint return was filed for the 1997 taxable year,            
          nor witnessed or signed such a return.  Finally, petitioner                 
          testified that she would have been unable to file separately for            
          1997 because Mr. Conner had withheld income tax documents from              
          her.  Again, as previously discussed, we believe that petitioner            
          was either in possession or could have easily acquired the                  
          necessary documents to file a separate return for 1997.                     
          Moreover, we believe Mr. Conner’s testimony that he neither kept            
          the aforementioned documents from petitioner nor agreed to file a           
          joint return “on their behalf” for taxable year 1997.                       
               Petitioner’s failure to file a Federal tax return for 1997             
          was not due to reasonable cause.  Petitioner failed to                      
          exercise ordinary care in assuring that a joint return was filed            
          and willfully neglected to file a separate return in the                    
          alternative.                                                                
               Petitioner’s 1997 Federal income tax return was due on April           
          15, 1998.  Petitioner never filed a return and failed to show               
          that she exercised ordinary care and prudence in this case.                 
          Accordingly, petitioner is liable for the addition to tax under             
          section 6651(a)(1).  Respondent is sustained on this issue.                 
               b.  Section 6654(a)                                                    
               Respondent also determined that petitioner is liable for an            
          addition to tax for the underpayment of estimated tax pursuant to           







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007