Robert Lindley Cowley - Page 7




                                        - 6 -                                         
          issue because he earned insufficient income in 1990 and had                 
          sufficient overpayments from subsequent tax years to satisfy any            
          tax liabilities for 1997 and 1999.  Petitioner also informed Ms.            
          Derrick that he was unsure whether he received the notice of                
          deficiency for 1990 because he was transient at that time.                  
               On November 21, 2005, respondent’s Appeals Office issued               
          petitioner a notice of determination sustaining the filing of the           
          notice of Federal tax lien.  In the notice of determination, Ms.            
          Derrick found that the 1990 notice of deficiency was mailed to              
          the correct address, and as a result petitioner could not dispute           
          the underlying liability for such year.  She also found that                
          petitioner’s overpayment credits did not satisfy his outstanding            
          tax liabilities for 1997 and 1999 because the credits were used             
          to offset petitioner’s 1990 tax liability.5  Additionally, Ms.              
          Derrick explained that petitioner was barred from using the                 
          $1,292 credit from 1998 to offset his outstanding tax liabilities           
          because the 1998 return was filed more than 2 years from the time           
          the tax was paid.6  Petitioner refused to discuss any collection            
          alternatives during the hearing.                                            



               5 Ms. Derrick’s determination did not indicate petitioner’s            
          overpayment credits were also used to offset his outstanding                
          liability in 1989.  See supra note 4.                                       
               6 See supra note 2.  Petitioner did not raise this issue at            
          trial.                                                                      






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007