- 16 - 4. Nonrequesting spouse’s legal obligation Petitioner and Mr. Parker’s divorce decree was not included in the record, and petitioner did not testify to the contents of it regarding the unpaid tax liability. Therefore, we cannot determine which spouse had the legal obligation under the decree to pay the outstanding tax liability. This factor is neutral. 5. Significant benefit Both Ms. Wilce and Ms. Hackmeister admitted that petitioner did not significantly benefit from the unpaid liability, and the record does not reflect otherwise. This factor weighs in favor of granting relief. 6. Compliance with income tax laws Respondent does not appear to contend that this factor applies, and he did not otherwise argue at trial that petitioner did not make a good faith effort to comply with her Federal income tax obligations in the years subsequent to 2002. Moreover, both Ms. Wilce and Ms. Hackmeister noted that petitioner met this requirement. Therefore, this factor weighs in favor of granting relief. 7. Abuse/mental or physical health Neither of these positive factors applies in this case. Petitioner was not abused by Mr. Parker, and there is no evidence in the administrative record that she suffered poor mental or physical health.Page: Previous 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 NextLast modified: November 10, 2007