V.R. DeAngelis M.D.P.C. & R.T. Domingo M.D.P.C., V. R. DeAngelis M.D.P.C., Tax Matters Partner, et al. - Page 51




                                       - 51 -                                         
          pay to Dr. Domingo his requested severance benefits totaling                
          approximately $220,000.                                                     
          XVI.  Dr. DeAngelis’s Receipt of Plan Benefits                              
               Dr. DeAngelis filed a claim for severance benefits with STEP           
          in November 2002.  In connection therewith, Dr. DeAngelis on                
          November 19, 2002, signed a “Request for Payment of Benefits”               
          stating that he was terminating his services because of “prostate           
          cancer, with symptoms which interfere with employee’s ability to            
          perform surgery” and that his compensation for the 12-month                 
          period before his termination of service was approximately                  
          $350,000.  Dr. DeAngelis underwent radiation and incurred                   
          radiation colitis to try to treat his prostate cancer and                   
          continued to work until December 31, 2003.                                  
               Wayne Bursey (Mr. Bursey), the president of SPSI, approved             
          the claim.  Mr. Bursey was concerned about the possibility of               
          future litigation between Dr. DeAngelis and STEP, insofar as Drs.           
          DeAngelis and Domingo had threatened suit against the prior plan            
          administrator but had never instituted any such litigation.                 
                                       OPINION                                        
          I.  Overview                                                                
               We are faced once again with an issue arising from a plan              
          designed aggressively to bolster the sale of insurance products             
          through a claim of permissible tax savings.  Cf. Neonatology                
          Associates, P.A. v. Commissioner, 115 T.C. 43, 99 (2000), affd.             







Page:  Previous  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  Next 

Last modified: March 27, 2008