- 65 - Associates, P.A. v. Commissioner, supra at 91-92, 95-96; see also Neonatology Associates, P.A. v. Commissioner, 299 F.3d at 231-232. In accordance with the Federal income tax law applicable to S corporations, most particularly sections 1367 and 1368, our disallowance of the deductions claimed by the PCs has the effect of increasing pro tanto the net income of those PCs, with corresponding increases to the doctors’ distributive shares of that income. That being so, the payments of the premiums are not taxed a second time to the doctors.23 Cf. Neonatology Associates, P.A. v. Commissioner, 115 T.C. at 95-96 (tax at the shareholder-level was appropriate where the employer was a C corporation). We have considered each argument made by petitioners for holdings contrary to those expressed herein and have rejected all arguments not discussed herein as irrelevant or without merit. We also have considered each argument made by respondent for a holding contrary to that expressed herein as to the inclusion in 23 In other words, we regard each distribution as a tax-free recovery of adjusted basis, taking into account the increase in basis resulting from the disallowance of deductions claimed by the PC.Page: Previous 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 NextLast modified: March 27, 2008