- 9 - Petitioner also attempted to show at trial that there was an excess amount available from the December 1997 through March 1998 levies for prior periods that should have been applied to the tax periods under consideration here. A comparison of the records of the County, and those of respondent, shows that the amount ultimately withheld from her salary by the County (net of “refunds”) was the same amount applied to satisfy her outstanding tax liabilities for 1990, 1992, and 1993. Respondent’s records indicate that only the amount necessary to satisfy her liabilities was received and applied. In addition, it seems that petitioner was given proper credit for withholding taxes for the years at issue. As petitioner failed to raise any other relevant issues, the Court finds that respondent’s determination in this case should be sustained. Decision will be entered for respondent.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9Last modified: November 10, 2007