Robert J. and Sylvia Deward - Page 3




                                        - 2 -                                         
               Respondent determined a deficiency of $3,913 in petitioners’           
          2001 Federal income tax and an addition to tax of $583 under                
          section 6651(a)(1).2                                                        
               The issue the Court must decide is whether $15,892 in “other           
          expenses” that petitioners listed on a Schedule C, Profit or Loss           
          From Business, attached to their 2001 tax return are “start-up              
          expenditures” as defined by section 195, resulting in the                   
          disallowance of deductions claimed for those expenditures.3                 
                                     Background                                       
               Some facts have been stipulated and are so found.  The                 
          stipulation of facts and the attached exhibits are incorporated             
          by this reference.  When the petition was filed, petitioners                
          resided in Walnut Creek, California.                                        
               Petitioner Robert J. Deward has a master’s degree in                   
          journalism from the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA).           
          Mr. Deward worked from 1970 through 1997 as a full-time                     



               2 Although the notice of deficiency refers to an accuracy-             
          related penalty under sec. 6662(a), respondent concedes that this           
          was a scrivener’s error by respondent and the notice of                     
          deficiency should have referred to the addition to tax under sec.           
          6651(a)(1).  Respondent has since conceded that petitioners are             
          not liable for any addition to tax under sec. 6651(a)(1).                   
               3 In the notice of deficiency, respondent adjusted                     
          petitioners’ medical expense deductions and miscellaneous                   
          itemized deductions because of the change in the determined                 
          amount of adjusted gross income.  The correctness of these                  
          adjustments depends upon our resolution of the issue stated                 
          above.                                                                      





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007