-3- additional checks. Again, the signatures on the checks are illegible. Respondent, concluding that the above documentation was inadequate, disallowed all $36,182 of the deductions claimed on Schedule A, Itemized Deductions, of petitioner’s 2003 Federal income tax return ($23,885 in home mortgage interest, $8,673 in state income tax, $363 in contributions, and $3,261 in miscellaneous expenses). Petitioner protested respondent’s audit adjustments to respondent’s Appeals Office but did not explain to respondent’s Appeals Office the confusing checks and signatures that petitioner had provided to respondent. On November 28, 2005, respondent determined a deficiency of $6,077 in petitioner’s 2003 Federal income taxes. The deficiency was based on a disallowance by respondent of the $36,182 claimed Schedule A deductions. On January 25, 2006, petitioner filed a petition regarding respondent’s November 28, 2005, notice of deficiency. In the petition, petitioner claimed that the documentation petitioner submitted to respondent during the audit adequately substantiated the deductions respondent had disallowed. On March 7, 2006, respondent filed an answer in which respondent argued that the documentation petitioner submitted toPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 10, 2007