William J. and Lois J. DiCindio - Page 5




                                         -5-                                          
          years in issue was an abuse of discretion.  We disagree.  Section           
          7122(c)(1) provides that the Secretary shall prescribe guidelines           
          for the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to use in determining                
          whether to accept an OIC.  The decision to accept or reject an              
          OIC, as well as the terms and conditions to which the IRS agrees,           
          is left to the discretion of the Secretary.  Sec. 301.7122-                 
          1(c)(1), Proced. & Admin. Regs.                                             
               Petitioners contend that returning their OIC for additional            
          information was arbitrary and capricious.  We disagree.                     
               If an offer accepted for processing does not contain                   
          sufficient information to permit the IRS to evaluate whether the            
          offer should be accepted, the IRS will request that the taxpayer            
          provide the needed additional information.  Sec. 301.7122-                  
          1(d)(2), Proced. & Admin. Regs.  On three separate occasions,               
          respondent’s OS contacted petitioners to request additional                 
          information.  The OS explained that this additional information             
          was necessary to account for discrepancies between petitioners’             
          Form 433-A and the information they had previously submitted.               
          Petitioners failed to provide the requested information.  If the            
          taxpayer does not submit the requested information to the IRS               
          within a reasonable time after a request, the IRS may return the            
          offer to the taxpayer.  Id.  The decision not to process                    
          petitioners’ OIC on account of their failure to provide                     
          additional information was consistent with the prescribed                   







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007