Kenneth Frank Diller - Page 4




                                        - 3 -                                         
               Petitioner filed a claim of age discrimination against                 
          Welding.  In 2002, he received $53,000 to settle his                        
          discrimination claim of which $19,055.58 was paid directly to his           
          attorney.  The parties agree that no part of the settlement paid            
          to petitioner by Welding was compensation for physical injury or            
          physical sickness, and petitioner made no allegation that the               
          damages were paid for medical care attributable to emotional                
          distress.                                                                   
               The parties also agree that petitioner received in 2002:               
          (1) At least $481 in self-employment income, (2) at least $155 in           
          taxable interest, of which $19 was withheld, (3) $202 of                    
          dividends, of which $23 was withheld, (4) a gain of $23 from the            
          sale of stocks and bonds, and (5) rental income of $5,744.23 and            
          rental expenses of $4,518.46.                                               
               The parties agree that petitioner filed a request for an               
          extension to file his 2002 Federal income tax return along with a           
          remittance of $1,500 on or before April 15, 2003.  But the                  
          parties also agree that petitioner has never filed a Federal                
          income tax return for 2002.  The Internal Revenue Service (IRS)             
          made a return for him under section 6020(b) for 2002.  The IRS              
          has no record of petitioner’s having filed a Federal income tax             
          return for 2001.                                                            
               During preparation for trial, petitioner informed respondent           
          that he had a business for which he paid significant business               







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007