Duyet Minh Nguyen - Page 8




                                        - 7 -                                         
               Petitioner also claimed dependency deductions for his two              
          children, but he was unable to show that he paid over one-half of           
          their support for the 2002 year or that he was otherwise entitled           
          to claim them as his dependents.  Finally, petitioner claimed               
          meals and entertainment expenses, but he was unable to identify             
          the names of the clients and other essential information required           
          for the allowance of a deduction under section 274(d).                      
               Although petitioner may have incurred additional expenses in           
          the conduct of his real estate business, the record is                      
          insufficient to enable the Court to allow any deductions beyond             
          those we have decided.                                                      
               Respondent determined that petitioner was liable for                   
          additions to tax under section 6651(a)(1) and (2), and section              
          6654(a).  Section 6651(a) provides for an addition to tax of 5              
          percent per month, up to 25 percent, for failure to file that is            
          not due to reasonable cause.  Petitioner has not shown reasonable           
          cause for failing to file a return.  See Bebb v. Commissioner, 36           
          T.C. 170, 173 (1961).  Petitioner’s reason for not filing or                
          paying the tax was that he could not afford to pay.  Section                
          6654(a) imposes an addition to tax for failure to pay estimated             
          tax.  That addition to tax is mandatory, unless a taxpayer falls            
          within one of the exceptions in section 6654(e).  Petitioner has            
          not shown that his situation falls within those exceptions.                 
               With respect to the additions to tax, respondent bears a               
          burden of production.  See sec. 7491(c).  The record in this                





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007