Steven A. Dykes - Page 4




                                        - 3 -                                         
          his illness.  In September of 2003, petitioner quitted his job              
          and moved to Arizona.                                                       
               The State of Washington’s Public Employees’ Retirement                 
          System filed with respondent a Form 1099-R, Distributions From              
          Pensions, Annuities, Retirement or Profit-Sharing Plans, IRAs,              
          Insurance Contracts, etc., reporting that petitioner received an            
          early distribution of $39,087.10 in 2003 (distribution).  At the            
          time, petitioner was 50 years old.                                          
               Petitioner filed for 2003, a Form 1040, U.S. Individual                
          Income Tax Return, reporting the distribution as income.                    
          Respondent subsequently issued to petitioner a statutory notice             
          of deficiency for 2003, determining that petitioner is liable for           
          an additional tax of $3,909 for an early distribution from his              
          retirement plan.                                                            
                                     Discussion                                       
               The Commissioner’s determinations are presumed correct, and            
          generally taxpayers bear the burden of proving otherwise.1  Rule            
          142(a)(1); Welch v. Helvering, 290 U.S. 111, 115 (1933).                    
               Respondent determined that, under section 72(t)(1),                    
          petitioner is liable for a 10-percent additional tax on an early            
          distribution from his retirement plan.  Petitioner disputes                 
          respondent’s determination, contending that he is not liable for            


               1Since this case is decided by applying the law to the                 
          undisputed facts, sec. 7491 is inapplicable.                                






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007