- 4 -
only irrelevant, unintelligible, and inflammatory statements,
nonsensical distortions, and irrelevant photographs.3
On August 4, 2004, respondent’s Exempt Organizations
Division mailed to petitioner a proposed denial of petitioner’s
requested tax-exempt status, concluding that petitioner had not
established that petitioner operates exclusively for educational
or any other exempt purpose.
On August 30, 2004, petitioner requested a hearing with
respondent’s Appeals Office relating to the proposed denial of
petitioner’s tax-exempt status.
From September 2004 to September 2005, respondent’s Appeals
Office gave petitioner the opportunity to submit additional
documents relating to the alleged conspiracy that formed the
content of petitioner’s purported educational activities.
Petitioner, however, only submitted additional documents similar
to the documents petitioner had earlier submitted to respondent.
In total, petitioner submitted to respondent more than 1,000
pages of documents consisting largely of nonsensical, emotionally
charged, and incomprehensible allegations.
On September 22, 2005, respondent’s Appeals Office mailed to
petitioner a final denial of petitioner’s requested tax-exempt
3For example, documents petitioner submitted assert that
because a church located in the neighborhood of the home of
Mr. Matthews placed the title of a sermon, “Dead Man Walking,” on
its church marquee, someone was trying to threaten the life of
Mr. Matthews.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011