- 4 -
return, the rental units are identified by addresses, as follows:
(1) East 149th St.; (2) Euclid Hgts. Blvd.; (3) Wickford Rd.;
(4) Continental; (5) E. 97th; (6) Parkhill; (7) E. 131st St.;
(8) Parkgate; (9) Graham; and (10) Endura.2
For the most part, and generally speaking, petitioner was
responsible for renting and managing the rental units. She
advertised when a unit was available. She conducted and attended
open houses showing the units. She arranged for utilities to be
turned on when necessary. She requested and reviewed credit
reports with respect to prospective tenants. She painted and
cleaned the units when necessary, and she arranged for repairs to
be made in those situations when she was not competent to make
the repairs herself.
In addition to activities related to a specific rental unit,
petitioner attended real estate auctions and reviewed listings of
real estate for sale by Government authorities and private
sellers. From time to time, she also met with officials from the
Federal or State Government agencies that administered the rent
subsidy programs.
Separate and apart from the calendar that petitioner kept in
connection with her employment at Symantec, petitioner maintained
2 At trial petitioner explained that the Graham and Endura
rental units were actually owned by her brother.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: March 27, 2008