- 2 - 1991, 1992, and 1993 taxable years. The issues we must decide are whether petitioner’s claim that notice and demand for payment was not sent to his last known address is barred by the doctrine of res judicata; whether the period of limitations on assessment of petitioner’s 1990 and 1991 income taxes expired; whether petitioner engaged in tournament sport fishing with the intent to make a profit as defined by section 183; and whether the lien may remain in place. Background The parties failed to submit a stipulation of facts but did stipulate the admission of certain exhibits. At the time of filing the petition, petitioner resided in Raleigh, North Carolina. During the years 1990 through 1993, Eastman Kodak Co. (Kodak) employed petitioner full time in Rochester, New York. As a full-time employee, petitioner worked at least 40 hours per week at Kodak. At the same time, petitioner engaged in the private practice of architecture between October and May of each year. On Schedules C, Profit or Loss From Business, of his 1990 through 1993 Federal income tax returns, petitioner indicated that he was engaged in the business of tournament sport fishingPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 10, 2007