Ronald and Judith Francis - Page 5

                                         -5-                                          
          necessary expenses under section 162(a).3  Respondent determined            
          that 60 percent of the $5,571 health insurance premium payments             
          for Mr. Francis was deductible under section 162(l) as the health           
          insurance costs of a self-employed individual.  Petitioners                 
          timely filed a petition.                                                    
                                       OPINION                                        
               We are asked to decide whether petitioners are entitled to             
          deduct medical expenses under section 162(a) and, if not, whether           
          they are entitled to deduct the health insurance premiums                   
          component of their medical expenses under section 162(l).  The              
          parties agree that petitioners are entitled to deduct the $1,998            
          wage component of Mrs. Francis’s compensation for 2001; they                
          disagree as to whether her total compensation, including the                
          reimbursement under the plan, was reasonable in amount.                     
               We look to the general rule that deductions are a matter of            
          legislative grace, and the taxpayer must show that he or she is             
          entitled to any deduction claimed.  Rule 142(a); Deputy v. du               
          Pont, 308 U.S. 488, 493 (1940).  This includes the burden of                
          substantiation.  Hradesky v. Commissioner, 65 T.C. 87, 89-90                
          (1975), affd. per curiam 540 F.2d 821 (5th Cir. 1976).                      
               In addition, taxpayers may fully deduct all ordinary and               
          necessary expenses paid or incurred during the taxable year                 

               3Respondent made no determination in the deficiency notice             
          regarding the deductibility of the $3,931 out-of-pocket medical             
          expenses under sec. 213.                                                    




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011