- 12 - regarding the questions raised in respondent’s motion.2 A taxpayer may raise challenges to the existence or the amount of the taxpayer’s underlying tax liability if the taxpayer did not receive a notice of deficiency or did not otherwise have an opportunity to dispute the tax liability. Sec. 6330(c)(2)(B). Petitioners’ Taxable Year 1998 According to respondent’s tax lien filing and respondent’s notice of tax lien, petitioners do not have any unpaid liability with respect to petitioners’ taxable year 1998. Respondent’s tax lien filing showed no amount with respect to petitioners’ taxable year 1998 under the heading “Unpaid Balance of Assessment” and respondent’s notice of tax lien showed zero dollars with respect to that year under the heading “Amount Owed”. We conclude that the tax lien filing with respect to petitioners’ taxable year 1998 was not proper. See sec. 6321. Petitioners’ Taxable Years 1999 Through 2003 Petitioners allege in the petition that respondent failed to account for all of the payments that they made with respect to 2Although the Court ordered petitioners to file a response to respondent’s motion, petitioners failed to do so. The only filings that petitioners made in this case are the petition and the designation of place of trial. The party opposing summary judgment must set forth specific facts that show a genuine issue of material fact exists and may not rely merely on allegations or denials in the pleadings. Grant Creek Water Works, Ltd. v. Commissioner, 91 T.C. 322, 325 (1988); Casanova Co. v. Commis- sioner, 87 T.C. 214, 217 (1986). Petitioners may not rely on their allegations in the petition in order to establish a genuine issue of material fact.Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 NextLast modified: November 10, 2007