Timothy R. and Cindy I. Fuller - Page 9

                                        - 9 -                                         
          affg. T.C. Memo. 1984-601.  Dealing in cash is also considered a            
          “badge of fraud” by the courts because it is indicative of a                
          taxpayer’s attempt to avoid scrutiny of his finances.  See id. at           
          308.                                                                        
               Respondent’s burden regarding the underpayment of tax in               
          support of the fraud penalty has been met.  Petitioners have                
          conceded overstatements of expenses and of costs of goods sold              
          and understatements of gross receipts for the years in issue.               
          Those misstatements resulted in substantial understatements of              
          petitioners’ tax liability for those years.                                 
               The evidence in this case establishes many “badges of                  
          fraud”.  It is undisputed that petitioners substantially                    
          understated their income for each of the years in issue.  For               
          2000, petitioners did not file a tax return until June 2002, and            
          then only after receiving a letter from the IRS requesting that a           
          2000 return be filed.  Petitioners’ substantial understatements             
          of income for all tax years in issue and their initial failure to           
          file a tax return for 2002 are both indicia of fraud.  See id. at           
          307.                                                                        
               Petitioners failed to cooperate with respondent by not                 
          responding to several letters from the IRS requesting interviews            
          and information, not submitting documents requested by the IRS              
          agent conducting the audit, and failing to appear at scheduled              
          interviews.  Petitioners did not provide the agent with any                 






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011