Duane D. & Ina R. Gay - Page 4




                                        - 4 -                                         
                      Mark Wagner - lease              $634.00                        
                      Brodey Pharmacy                $8,088.57                        
                      Labor                         $20,180.00                        
                      Rental Utilities                 $485.00                        
                      Tooley Drug                    $1,940.42                        
                      Oakwood Nursing Home          $18,598.89                        
                      Episcopal Church               $1,200.00                        
                      Building Supplies             $28,624.00                        
                      Aunt Lorraine’s Health Ins.    $1,092.00                        
                      Taxes                          $8,699.29                        
                                                    $89,542.17                        
               Respondent issued to petitioners a notice of deficiency                
          (notice) for their taxable years 2000 and 2001.  In that notice,            
          respondent determined, inter alia, that $26,971.69 of the total             
          expenses of $61,654 that petitioners claimed in the 2000 Schedule           
          E and $39,083 of the total expenses of $89,542 that petitioners             
          claimed in the attachment to the 2001 Schedule E and the second             
          attachment to the 2001 Schedule E must be capitalized and amor-             
          tized.  In the notice, respondent also determined that petition-            
          ers are liable for each of their taxable years 2000 and 2001 for            
          the accuracy-related penalty under section 6662(a).                         
                                       OPINION                                        
               Petitioners bear the burden of proving that the determina-             
          tions in the notice are erroneous.2  Rule 142(a); Welch v.                  

               2Petitioners do not claim that the burden of proof shifts to           
                                                             (continued...)           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007