Robert and Ines M. Gillespie, et al. - Page 10




                                       - 10 -                                         
          Ms. Lacorte’s Appearance                                                    
               On November 15, 2005, Ms. Lacorte filed an entry of                    
          appearance in each case.                                                    
          Amended Petitions                                                           
               On December 16, 2005, approximately 2-1/2 months before                
          commencement of the Las Vegas trial session, petitioners all                
          moved for leave to amend petition.  Those motions are signed by             
          Mr. Jones and Ms. Lacorte.  The accompanying amended petitions              
          were lodged with the Court on the same date, and, on December 19,           
          2005, we ordered respondent to respond to the motions for leave             
          to amend.  On January 17, 2006, respondent informed the Court               
          that he had no objection to our granting the motions.  On January           
          19, 2006, we granted all of the motions, and we filed the amended           
          petitions.  Mr. Jones executed each amended petition on behalf of           
          the named petitioners.                                                      
               In each amended petition, petitioners aver numerous                    
          instances of abuse of discretion by the settlement officer; viz,            
          (1) She did not give petitioners adequate time to make their                
          case, including raising collection alternatives, such as an                 
          offer-in-compromise; (2) she failed to provide petitioners a copy           
          of their individual master file and other relevant documentation;           
          (3) the period of limitations had expired for the 1996 and 1997             
          tax years; (4) the settlement officer was biased against                    
          petitioners because of their use of the trust system; (5) there             







Page:  Previous  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007