Dovid and Marcia L. Goldfarb - Page 6

                                        - 5 -                                         
          2000-281.  Subject to exceptions not relevant here, modified                
          adjusted gross income means adjusted gross income (AGI).                    
               Petitioners filed a joint return and reported AGI of                   
          $76,633.  Adding one-half of the $13,524 of the Social Security             
          benefits to the reported AGI yields a total of $83,395.  Because            
          this amount exceeds $44,000, petitioners must include up to 85              
          percent of the Social Security benefits in gross income.                    
               Petitioners do not dispute that their AGI exceeded $44,000.            
          Petitioners argue, however, that only the income of the recipient           
          of Social Security benefits is relevant for purposes of section             
          86.  Petitioners note that section 86 refers to “taxpayer” in the           
          singular and not “taxpayers” in the plural.  For example, section           
          86(b)(1)(A)(i) refers to “the modified adjusted gross income of             
          the taxpayer”.  Petitioners contend that Mr. Goldfarb’s income              
          therefore should be excluded from AGI in applying the formula               
          under section 86.  Because petitioner’s income alone did not                
          exceed $44,000, petitioners contend, a lesser amount of Social              
          Security benefits is taxable.  We disagree.                                 
               “In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, unless             
          the context indicates otherwise--words importing the singular               
          include and apply to several persons, parties, or things”.  1               
          U.S.C. sec. 1 (2000).  This rule applies “where it is necessary             
          to carry out the evident intent of the statute.”  First Natl.               
          Bank in St. Louis v. Missouri, 263 U.S. 640, 657 (1924); Pope &             






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011