Jeffrey Lee Golian - Page 7




                                        - 6 -                                         
               Petitioner also does not contend that he satisfies any of              
          the specific exceptions set forth in section 72(t)(2).  Rather,             
          petitioner contends that the 10-percent additional tax should not           
          apply because of financial hardship.  However, we have expressly            
          held that financial hardship is not an exception to the                     
          additional tax imposed by section 72(t).  E.g., Arnold v.                   
          Commissioner, 111 T.C. 250, 255 (1998); Milner v. Commissioner,             
          T.C. Memo. 2004-111; Gallagher v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2001-34.         
               We recognize that petitioner received his IRA distribution             
          at a time when he was both a single parent and temporarily                  
          unemployed and that he used the distribution for a laudable                 
          purpose.  Unfortunately for petitioner, we are bound by the list            
          of statutory exceptions set forth in section 72(t)(2).  Schoof v.           
          Commissioner, 110 T.C. 1, 11 (1998); Clark v. Commissioner, 101             
          T.C. 215, 224-225 (1993); Swihart v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo.               
          1998-407.  Thus, although we may be sympathetic to petitioner’s             
          position, we are constrained to sustain respondent’s                        
          determination on this issue.                                                
               Finally, the fact that respondent only determined the 10-              
          percent additional tax sometime after making a mechanical                   
          adjustment to petitioner’s return upon its initial processing is            
          of no moment.8  The fact of the matter is that respondent sent              

               8  See sec. 68, imposing an overall limitation on itemized             
          deductions, and sec. 6213(b)(1), permitting summary assessments             
                                                             (continued...)           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007