Greg Griffin - Page 7




                                        - 6 -                                         
          2. Abuse of Discretion                                                      
               A taxpayer may appeal the Commissioner’s determination with            
          this Court within a 30-day period starting on the day after the             
          date of the Notice of Determination.  Sec. 6330(d)(1).  In                  
          reviewing the Commissioner’s determination, this Court applies an           
          abuse of discretion standard.  Sego v. Commissioner, 114 T.C.               
          604, 610 (2000).                                                            
               In making a determination, the Appeals officer must consider           
          the following:  (1) Whether any applicable law or administrative            
          procedure has been followed; (2) the issues properly raised by              
          the taxpayer; and (3) whether the proposed collection action                
          balances the need for the efficient collection of taxes with the            
          taxpayer’s legitimate concern that the collection action be no              
          more intrusive than necessary.  Sec. 6330(c)(3).                            
               The applicable laws and administrative procedures were                 
          satisfied since petitioner received the required notices and was            
          advised of his rights for a hearing within the timeframes                   
          mandated by sections 6303, 6320, and 6330.                                  
               The Appeals officer did not consider any issues raised by              
          petitioner because:  (1) The underlying tax liabilities were not            
          properly at issue; and (2) she could not consider any collection            
          alternatives since petitioner refused to suggest any, he refused            
          to provide the required financial information, and he chose not             
          to proceed with the hearing.                                                







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007