Lee F. Haney, Sr., and Jean C. Haney, a.k.a. Jeanie Haney - Page 17




                                       - 17 -                                         
               In 2001, Flair Enterprises purchased gocarts costing                   
          $2,160.70 and deducted the cost under miscellaneous expenses.               
          The gocarts were bought with company funds by petitioner as toys            
          for his grandchildren.  Also in 2001, a storm shelter was                   
          purchased for $5,670 by Flair Enterprises and deducted as an                
          office supplies expense of the company.  The storm shelter is               
          located at petitioners’ personal residence inside their garage;             
          nothing related to the Flair Body Works business is stored in the           
          shelter.  During the years in issue, numerous dry cleaning bills            
          were paid by Flair Enterprises for petitioners and their family             
          members.  Department store and gift shop purchases were also                
          reimbursed as business expenses of the company, for which no                
          substantiation of business purpose has been provided.                       
               No substantiation of deductibility has been provided for               
          numerous company checks made payable to petitioners’ sons.  For             
          example, no explanation has been provided for reimbursements to             
          Phillip Haney by Flair Enterprises for dog food and a tee ball              
          glove, which were deducted as shop supply expenses.  During the             
          years in issue, Flair Enterprises deducted loan payments made on            
          Mrs. Haney’s Mercedes and Gina Haney’s Suburban vehicles.  One              
          $3,325.32 check to Mercedes Benz of OKC was categorized on the              
          company’s books as a “Materials” expense.  Flair Enterprises                
          deducted numerous payments related to petitioners’                          
          grandchildren’s school and extracurricular activities.  In 2000,            







Page:  Previous  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007