Dimitri L. Harris - Page 3




                                        - 2 -                                         
          Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not              
          reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be                
          treated as precedent for any other case.                                    
               Respondent determined a deficiency of $6,211.18 in Federal             
          income tax for petitioner’s 2005 tax year.                                  
               The issues for decision are whether, for the year 2005,                
          petitioner is entitled to (1) dependency exemption deductions for           
          two children under section 151(c); (2) head of household filing             
          status under section 2(b)(1); (3) the earned income credit under            
          section 32(a); (4) the child care credit under section 21(a)(1);            
          and (5) the additional child tax credit under section 24(a).                
               Some of the facts were stipulated.  Those facts, with the              
          exhibits annexed thereto, are so found and are made part hereof.            
          Petitioner’s legal residence at the time the petition was filed             
          was Atlanta, Georgia.  For reasons of privacy, the two children             
          claimed as dependents on petitioner’s 2005 Federal income tax               
          return are not identified by name and are referred to simply as             
          the “children”.                                                             




               1(...continued)                                                        
          Commissioner only if the taxpayer has complied with all                     
          requirements as to substantiation and has maintained the                    
          necessary books and records with respect to the factual issues.             
          The burden does not shift to respondent in this case because                
          petitioner maintained no books and records or any other factual             
          evidence to establish his entitlement to the principal issue,               
          entitlement to dependency exemption deductions.                             






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: March 27, 2008