Gerard and Audrey Kathleen Hennessey - Page 24




                                       - 24 -                                         
               On August 25, 1997, Agent Sutton prepared and sent a                   
          Referral Report of Potential Criminal Fraud Cases to the Criminal           
          Investigation Division (CID) of the IRS with respect to                     
          petitioners, Beacon, and ISOA, Inc., for the taxable years under            
          examination (the criminal fraud referral).  The criminal fraud              
          referral for petitioners and Beacon was based, in part, on the              
          substantial overstatement of deductions with respect to income              
          and the overall incompleteness of documentation provided by                 
          petitioners at that point in the examination.  With respect to              
          ISOA, Inc., the criminal fraud referral was based largely on the            
          $195,000 of “deferred income” from licensing fees that was                  
          omitted from income and classified by ISOA, Inc., as “Advanced              
          Royalties” on the 1995 return.  Special Agent Mike Metzler of the           
          CID informed petitioners that their individual returns for the              
          taxable years at issue were under a criminal fraud investigation.           
               On January 20, 1998, Agent Sutton issued a Revenue Agent’s             
          Report (RAR) with respect to petitioners’ 1992 taxable year (1992           
          RAR).  The 1992 RAR proposed an income tax deficiency of $14,750            
          and total penalties of $14,604.  The 1992 RAR, in part,                     
          disallowed all of petitioners’ claimed Schedule C deductions on             
          the basis that ISOA Consulting was not a trade or business and              
          that the claimed expenses were either nondeductible personal                
          expenses or that they had been deducted by petitioners elsewhere            
          on the 1992 return.                                                         







Page:  Previous  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007