Estate of Kimberly A. Hicks, Deceased, Key Trust Company of Ohio, N.A., Administrator - Page 21




                                       - 21 -                                         
                    [T]he risk that parties to a tort suit will                       
                    allocate away the State’s interest can be                         
                    avoided either by obtaining the State’s                           
                    advance agreement to an allocation or, if                         
                    necessary, by submitting the matter to a                          
                    court for decision.                                               
          Id. at ___, 126 S. Ct. at 1765 & n.17 (emphasis added).                     
               We view with some skepticism the Commissioner’s fear that              
          upholding the deductibility of the loan repayment here will                 
          trigger a massive recharacterization of settlement proceeds as              
          intrafamily loans in the future.  But we take cases one at a                
          time, and here the facts persuade us that Clyde’s loan had real             
          substance--it was concededly valid under Ohio law, and resulted             
          in the creation of real interest income on which he really did              
          pay tax.  We are particularly persuaded by the evidence that the            
          Hickses were trying very hard to comply with the complex                    
          Medicaid-eligibility rules in settling the trusts.  As the                  
          Supreme Court said in a leading opinion on substance-over-form,             
                    where, as here, there is a genuine multiple-                      
                    party transaction with economic substance                         
                    which is compelled or encouraged by business                      
                    or regulatory realities, is imbued with tax-                      
                    independent considerations, and is not shaped                     
                    solely by tax-avoidance features that have                        
                    meaningless labels attached, the Government                       
                    should honor the allocation of rights and                         
                    duties effectuated by the parties * * *.                          
          Frank Lyon Co. v. United States, 435 U.S. 561, 583-84 (1978).               
          We therefore honor the allocation disputed here, and find                   
          that the $1 million loan was bona fide and for adequate and full            







Page:  Previous  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007