Elsa Estelle Hopkins - Page 8




                                        - 7 -                                         
          without sound basis in fact or law.  Woodral v. Commissioner, 112           
          T.C. 19, 23 (1999); Keller v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2006-166;            
          Fowler v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2004-163.                                
               Petitioner did not propose any collection alternatives to              
          the Appeals officer, did not provide requested documentation to             
          him, and failed to state in her Form 12153 why she did not agree            
          with the notice of Federal tax lien.  The sole issue that                   
          petitioner raised was her entitlement to relief under section               
          6015(f).                                                                    
          II.  Petitioner’s Request for Relief Under Section 6015(f)                  
               Generally, married taxpayers may elect to file a joint                 
          Federal income tax return.  Sec. 6013(a).  Each spouse filing a             
          joint return is jointly and severally liable for the accuracy of            
          the return and the entire tax due for that year.  Sec.                      
          6013(d)(3).  A spouse who has made a joint return may, however,             
          seek relief from joint and several liability by following                   
          procedures established in section 6015.  Sec. 6015(a).                      
               In cases of underpayment, section 6015(f) applies.4  Section           
          6015(f) provides, in part, that a taxpayer may be relieved from             
          joint and several liability if it is determined that, taking into           
          account all the facts and circumstances, it is inequitable to               

               4 Sec. 6015(b) and (c) applies only when there is an                   
          understatement of tax or a deficiency in tax.  See Hopkins v.               
          Commissioner, 121 T.C. 73, 88 (2003).  Because there is no                  
          understatement of tax or deficiency here, these subsections do              
          not apply.                                                                  






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007