- 7 - without sound basis in fact or law. Woodral v. Commissioner, 112 T.C. 19, 23 (1999); Keller v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2006-166; Fowler v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2004-163. Petitioner did not propose any collection alternatives to the Appeals officer, did not provide requested documentation to him, and failed to state in her Form 12153 why she did not agree with the notice of Federal tax lien. The sole issue that petitioner raised was her entitlement to relief under section 6015(f). II. Petitioner’s Request for Relief Under Section 6015(f) Generally, married taxpayers may elect to file a joint Federal income tax return. Sec. 6013(a). Each spouse filing a joint return is jointly and severally liable for the accuracy of the return and the entire tax due for that year. Sec. 6013(d)(3). A spouse who has made a joint return may, however, seek relief from joint and several liability by following procedures established in section 6015. Sec. 6015(a). In cases of underpayment, section 6015(f) applies.4 Section 6015(f) provides, in part, that a taxpayer may be relieved from joint and several liability if it is determined that, taking into account all the facts and circumstances, it is inequitable to 4 Sec. 6015(b) and (c) applies only when there is an understatement of tax or a deficiency in tax. See Hopkins v. Commissioner, 121 T.C. 73, 88 (2003). Because there is no understatement of tax or deficiency here, these subsections do not apply.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 10, 2007