- 11 - After making adjustments to petitioners’ monthly expenses, respondent determined that $145,222 was collectible from petitioners’ future income.7 Because petitioners’ State tax debt would be satisfied by July 2007, respondent determined that there was an “amount collectible from retired debt” over the period remaining on the collection statute of $14,924. Respondent concluded that petitioners had a reasonable collection potential of $394,318. Because petitioners had the ability to pay substantially more than the amount offered, respondent rejected their offer-in- compromise based on doubt as to collectibility with special circumstances. Respondent also rejected their effective tax administration offer-in-compromise based on economic hardship because they had the ability to pay their tax liability in full. Finally, respondent rejected their effective tax administration offer-in-compromise based on public policy or equity ground because the case “fails to meet the criteria for such consideration”. Respondent concluded that petitioners did not offer an acceptable collection alternative, that all requirements of law and administrative procedure had been met, and that the Federal tax lien represented the most efficient means to protect the 7 Respondent determined that petitioners had monthly disposable income of $1,886 and multiplied this by 77, the number of months remaining on the collection statute.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011