In Touch Properties, LLC, David England, Tax Matters Partner - Page 14




                                        -14-                                          
          the promissory notes were valid negotiable instruments under                
          State law.                                                                  
               Finally, petitioner failed to produce credible evidence to             
          prove the nature and extent of the consulting services provided             
          to In Touch during 2000 or to prove that the economic performance           
          requirement of section 461(h)(1) was satisfied with respect to              
          the consulting fees claimed by In Touch on its 2000 return.                 
          Consequently, we hold that petitioner failed to demonstrate that            
          respondent’s disallowance of In Touch’s claimed consulting fees             
          was erroneous, and we sustain respondent’s determination.                   
          III.  Substantiation of Expenses                                            
               Deductions are a matter of legislative grace, and the                  
          taxpayer must clearly demonstrate entitlement to any deductions             
          claimed.  INDOPCO, Inc. v. Commissioner, 503 U.S. 79, 84 (1992).            
          A taxpayer is obligated to keep records sufficient to allow the             
          Commissioner to establish the correct amount of the taxpayer’s              
          deductions.  Sec. 6001; sec. 1.6001-1(a), Income Tax Regs.  A               
          taxpayer must produce those records upon request for inspection             
          by authorized internal revenue officers or employees.  Sec.                 
          7602(a); sec. 1.6001-1(e), Income Tax Regs.  If upon examination            
          the Commissioner disallows a business expense deduction, the                
          taxpayer bears the burden of introducing evidence to substantiate           
          the claimed deduction.  Rule 142(a); see also Wilson v.                     






Page:  Previous  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007