Estate of Burton W. Kanter, Deceased, Joshua S. Kanter, Executor, and Naomi R. Kanter, et al. - Page 191

                                                -264-                                                   
            Partnership.  The record reflects that personnel associated with                            
            MHM in effect provided all the financial and accounting services                            
            that GHM required to fulfill its hotel management contracts.  For                           
            the most part, Connolly simply continued to serve as the onsite                             
            manager of the Gateway Hilton.                                                              
                  In late 1983, Prudential awarded to MHM the hotel management                          
            contract for the Twin Sixties Hotel.  Shortly thereafter, MHM and                           
            Essex Partnership modified their representation and marketing                               
            agreement to provide that MHM would pay 70 percent of its                                   
            management fees from the Madison Hotel and 57 percent of its                                
            management fees from the Allentown Hilton and the newly acquired                            
            Twin Sixties Hotel management contract.  On January 1, 1986,                                
            Connolly executed a new representation and marketing agreement on                           
            behalf of GHM which provided that GHM would pay to Essex                                    
            Partnership 40 percent of the fees earned on the Gateway Hilton                             
            and Midland Hilton management contracts.                                                    
                  Over time, the total fees that MHM paid to Essex Partnership                          
            generally equaled the total fees that GHM paid to the                                       
            partnership, and the total fees MHM paid to the partnership                                 
            roughly approximated MHM’s distributive share of partnership                                
            income as a 47.5-percent partner in Essex Partnership.  However,                            
            as indicated previously, MHM was not paid directly for the                                  
            substantial services its employees rendered to GHM.  Rather, as a                           
            partner in Essex Partnership, MHM received 47.5 percent of the                              






Page:  Previous  254  255  256  257  258  259  260  261  262  263  264  265  266  267  268  269  270  271  272  273  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011