Estate of Burton W. Kanter, Deceased, Joshua S. Kanter, Executor, and Naomi R. Kanter, et al. - Page 228

                                                -298-                                                   
            1989 and the portions of those payments that constitute income                              
            properly attributable to Kanter:123                                                         
            Total payments                                                                              
                        Year          to THC            Kanter                                          
            1981         $80,616            $80,616                                                     
            1982          70,538             70,538                                                     
            1983          80,325             80,325                                                     
            1984         822,840            595,333                                                     
            1985       1,514,882          1,287,375                                                     
            1986       1,069,335            841,828                                                     
            1987         132,323            132,323                                                     
            1988          96,188             96,188                                                     
            1989          42,322             42,322                                                     
            Issue II.  Whether Kanter and Ballard Are Liable for Additions to                           
                  Tax for Fraud                                                                         
                                               OPINION                                                  
                  Having determined the payments from The Five represented                              
            income earned by Kanter, Ballard, and Lisle, we must review                                 
            respondent’s determinations that Kanter and Ballard are liable                              
            for additions to tax for fraud.                                                             
                  In asserting that a taxpayer is liable for the addition to                            
            tax for fraud, the Commissioner has the burden of proving, by                               
            clear and convincing evidence, that some part of the underpayment                           
            for each year at issue was due to fraud.  Sec. 7454(a); Rule                                
            142(b).  Consequently, the Commissioner must establish (1) an                               
            underpayment, and (2) that some part of the underpayment is due                             

                  123  Kanter’s total share of the $2,763,500 in payments that                          
            Schaffel remitted to THC during 1984 to 1986 has been reduced to                            
            $2,080,980 to account for the $682,520 that we conclude Kanter                              
            transferred to Lisle (representing Lisle’s share of a portion of                            
            the Schaffel payments) by way of FPC Subventure Partnership.                                





Page:  Previous  288  289  290  291  292  293  294  295  296  297  298  299  300  301  302  303  304  305  306  307  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011